Fix probability space ( Ω , F , Pr ) (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \Pr) ( Ω , F , Pr ) , for real number p > 0 p > 0 p > 0 , let L p L_p L p denote the vector space of real value random variable for which E ∣ X ∣ p < ∞ \mathbb{E} |X|^p < \infty E ∣ X ∣ p < ∞ .
For p ≥ 1 p \ge 1 p ≥ 1 , the p p p norm ∥ X ∥ p \Vert X \Vert_p ∥ X ∥ p of a random variable X ∈ L p X \in L_p X ∈ L p is defined as
∥ X ∥ p = ( E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] ) 1 / p .
\Vert X \Vert_p = \left( \mathbb{E} \big[ |X|^p \big] \right)^{1 / p}.
∥ X ∥ p = ( E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] ) 1/ p . Norm
∥ X ∥ p \Vert X \Vert_p ∥ X ∥ p is a norm.
Proof. This can be proven directly by Minkowski’s inequality . For completeness, we give the details here. Let X , Y ∈ L p X, Y \in L_p X , Y ∈ L p , and let a = ∥ X ∥ p a = \Vert X \Vert_p a = ∥ X ∥ p and b = ∥ Y ∥ p b = \Vert Y \Vert_p b = ∥ Y ∥ p . We want to prove that
∥ X + Y ∥ p ≤ a + b ⟺ ∥ a a + b ⋅ X a + a a + b ⋅ Y a ∥ p ≤ 1.
\Vert X + Y \Vert_p \le a + b \Longleftrightarrow \left\Vert \frac{a}{ a + b} \cdot \frac{X}{a} + \frac{a}{ a + b} \cdot \frac{Y}{a} \right\Vert_p \le 1.
∥ X + Y ∥ p ≤ a + b ⟺ a + b a ⋅ a X + a + b a ⋅ a Y p ≤ 1. It suffices to assume that ∥ X ∥ p = ∥ Y ∥ p = 1 \Vert X \Vert_p = \Vert Y \Vert_p = 1 ∥ X ∥ p = ∥ Y ∥ p = 1 and prove that
For t ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] t \in [0, 1] t ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] , ∥ t X + ( 1 − t ) Y ∥ p ≤ 1 \Vert t X + (1 - t) Y \Vert_p \le 1 ∥ tX + ( 1 − t ) Y ∥ p ≤ 1 .
This is much easier to prove as we can take the power of p p p of both side and show that:
∥ t X + ( 1 − t ) Y ∥ p p = E [ ∣ t X + ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] ≤ E [ ∣ t X ∣ p + ∣ ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] = E [ ∣ t X ∣ p ] + E [ ∣ ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] = t p ∥ X ∥ p p + ( 1 − t ) p ∥ Y ∥ p p ≤ t + ( 1 − t ) = 1.
\begin{aligned}
\Vert t X + (1 - t) Y \Vert_p^p
&= \mathbb{E}[ |t X + (1 - t) Y |^p ] \\
&\le \mathbb{E}[ | tX |^p + | (1 - t) Y|^p ] \\
&= \mathbb{E}[ | tX |^p ] + \mathbb{E} [ | ( 1 - t) Y|^p ] \\
&= t^p \Vert X \Vert_p^p + ( 1 - t)^p \Vert Y \Vert_p^p \\
&\le t + (1 - t) \\
&= 1.
\end{aligned}
∥ tX + ( 1 − t ) Y ∥ p p = E [ ∣ tX + ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] ≤ E [ ∣ tX ∣ p + ∣ ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] = E [ ∣ tX ∣ p ] + E [ ∣ ( 1 − t ) Y ∣ p ] = t p ∥ X ∥ p p + ( 1 − t ) p ∥ Y ∥ p p ≤ t + ( 1 − t ) = 1. □ \square □
Properties
Theorem. For 0 ≤ p ≤ q 0 \le p \le q 0 ≤ p ≤ q , ( E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] ) 1 / p ≤ ( E [ ∣ X ∣ q ] ) 1 / q \big( \mathbb{E} [ |X|^p ] \big)^{1 / p} \le \big( \mathbb{E} [ |X|^q ] \big)^{1 / q} ( E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] ) 1/ p ≤ ( E [ ∣ X ∣ q ] ) 1/ q .
Corollary For 1 ≤ p ≤ q 1 \le p \le q 1 ≤ p ≤ q , ∥ X ∥ p ≤ ∥ X ∥ q \Vert X \Vert_p \le \Vert X \Vert_q ∥ X ∥ p ≤ ∥ X ∥ q .
Proof. By convexity of the function y = ∣ x ∣ q / p y = |x|^{q / p} y = ∣ x ∣ q / p , we have
∣ E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] ∣ q / p ≤ E [ ∣ ∣ X ∣ p ∣ q / p ] = E [ ∣ X ∣ q ]
\begin{aligned}
\Big| \mathbb{E} \big[ |X|^p \big] \Big|^{q / p}
\le
\mathbb{E} \left[ \Big| |X|^p \Big|^{q / p} \right]
= \mathbb{E} \left[ |X|^q \right]
\end{aligned}
E [ ∣ X ∣ p ] q / p ≤ E [ ∣ X ∣ p q / p ] = E [ ∣ X ∣ q ] Raising both hand sides to the power of 1 / q 1 / q 1/ q finish the proof.
□ \square □
Let X 1 , . . . , X n ∈ L p X_1, ..., X_n \in L_p X 1 , ... , X n ∈ L p be independent random variables and let r 1 , . . . , r n r_1, ... ,r_n r 1 , ... , r n be independent Rademacher random variables. Then
∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − E [ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i ] ∥ p ≤ 2 ⋅ ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] r i X i ∥ p
\left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \mathbb{E} \left[ \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i \right] \right\Vert_p \le 2 \cdot \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } r_i X_i \right\Vert_p
i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − E i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i p ≤ 2 ⋅ i ∈ [ n ] ∑ r i X i p
Proof. For i ∈ [ n ] i \in [n] i ∈ [ n ] , let Y i Y_i Y i be independent copy of X i X_i X i . Then
∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − E [ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i ] ∥ p = ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − E Y [ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Y i ] ∥ p = ( E X [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − E Y [ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Y i ] ∣ p ] ) 1 / p ≤ ( E X E Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Y i ∣ p ] ) 1 / p ( Jensen ) = ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] ( X i − Y i ) ∥ p
\begin{aligned}
\left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \mathbb{E} \left[ \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i \right] \right\Vert_p
&= \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \mathbb{E}_Y \left[ \sum_{i \in [n] } Y_i \right] \right\Vert_p \\
&= \left( \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \mathbb{E}_Y \left[ \sum_{i \in [n] } Y_i \right] \right|^p \right] \right)^{1 / p} \\
&\le \left( \mathbb{E}_X \mathbb{E}_Y \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \sum_{i \in [n] } Y_i \right|^p \right] \right)^{1 / p} &( \text{Jensen}) \\
&= \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } (X_i - Y_i) \right\Vert_p
\end{aligned}
i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − E i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i p = i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − E Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Y i p = E X i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − E Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Y i p 1/ p ≤ E X E Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Y i p 1/ p = i ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( X i − Y i ) p ( Jensen ) Let Z = ( Z 1 , . . . , Z n ) Z = (Z_1, ..., Z_n) Z = ( Z 1 , ... , Z n ) be a sequence of independent random variables, such that either Z i = X i − Y i Z_i = X_i - Y_i Z i = X i − Y i or Z i = Y i − X i Z_i = Y_i - X_i Z i = Y i − X i . Let Γ = { Z } \Gamma = \{ Z \} Γ = { Z } be the set of 2 n 2^n 2 n such sequences. As X i − Y i X_i - Y_i X i − Y i and Y i − X i Y_i - X_i Y i − X i have the same distributions, we have for Z ∈ Γ Z \in \Gamma Z ∈ Γ ,
E Z [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Z i ∣ p ] = E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − Y i ∣ p ] .
\mathbb{E}_Z \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n] } Z_i \right|^p \right] = \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n]} X_i - Y_i \right|^p \right].
E Z i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Z i p = E X , Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − Y i p . Therefore,
1 ∣ Γ ∣ ∑ Z ∈ Γ E Z [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Z i ∣ p ] = E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − Y i ∣ p ] .
\frac{1}{ |\Gamma| } \sum_{ Z \in \Gamma } \mathbb{E}_Z \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n] } Z_i \right|^p \right] = \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n]} X_i - Y_i \right|^p \right].
∣Γ∣ 1 Z ∈ Γ ∑ E Z i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Z i p = E X , Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − Y i p . If R = ( r 1 , . . . , r n ) R = (r_1, ..., r_n) R = ( r 1 , ... , r n ) are Rademacher random variables, then ( r 1 ( X 1 − Y 1 ) , . . . , r n ( X n − Y n ) (r_1 (X_1 - Y_1), ..., r_n(X_n - Y_n) ( r 1 ( X 1 − Y 1 ) , ... , r n ( X n − Y n ) gives a uniformly sequence in Γ \Gamma Γ . It holds that
E R E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] r i ( X i − Y i ) ∣ p ] = 1 ∣ Γ ∣ ∑ Z ∈ Γ E Z [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] Z i ∣ p ] = E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − Y i ∣ p ] .
\mathbb{E}_R \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n]} r_i (X_i - Y_i) \right|^p \right] = \frac{1}{ |\Gamma| } \sum_{ Z \in \Gamma } \mathbb{E}_Z \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n] } Z_i \right|^p \right] = \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in [n]} X_i - Y_i \right|^p \right].
E R E X , Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ r i ( X i − Y i ) p = ∣Γ∣ 1 Z ∈ Γ ∑ E Z i ∈ [ n ] ∑ Z i p = E X , Y i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − Y i p . Hence,
∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i − E [ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] X i ] ∥ p ≤ ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] ( X i − Y i ) ∥ p = ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] r i ( X i − Y i ) ∥ p ≤ 2 ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] r i X i ∥ p
\begin{aligned}
\left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i - \mathbb{E} \left[ \sum_{i \in [n] } X_i \right] \right\Vert_p
&\le \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } (X_i - Y_i) \right\Vert_p \\
&= \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } r_i(X_i - Y_i) \right\Vert_p \\
&\le 2 \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } r_i X_i \right\Vert_p
\end{aligned}
i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i − E i ∈ [ n ] ∑ X i p ≤ i ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( X i − Y i ) p = i ∈ [ n ] ∑ r i ( X i − Y i ) p ≤ 2 i ∈ [ n ] ∑ r i X i p □ \square □
Remark: We can simply the argument as follows. For a fixed sequence ( r 1 , . . . , r n ) ∈ { − 1 , 1 } n (r_1,..., r_n) \in \{-1, 1 \}^n ( r 1 , ... , r n ) ∈ { − 1 , 1 } n , the sequence ( r 1 ( X 1 − Y 1 ) , . . . , r n ( X n − Y n ) ) (r_1(X_1 - Y_1), ..., r_n(X_n - Y_n) ) ( r 1 ( X 1 − Y 1 ) , ... , r n ( X n − Y n )) has the same distribution as ( X 1 − Y n , . . . , X n − Y n ) (X_1 - Y_n, ..., X_n - Y_n) ( X 1 − Y n , ... , X n − Y n ) . Averaging over all such possible sequences gives that
∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] ( X i − Y i ) ∥ p = ∥ ∑ i ∈ [ n ] r i ( X i − Y i ) ∥ p .
\left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } (X_i - Y_i) \right\Vert_p = \left\Vert \sum_{i \in [n] } r_i(X_i - Y_i) \right\Vert_p.
i ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( X i − Y i ) p = i ∈ [ n ] ∑ r i ( X i − Y i ) p .
Let X 1 , . . . , X n X_1, ..., X_n X 1 , ... , X n be independent and mean zero random variables and let Y 1 , . . . , Y n Y_1, ..., Y_n Y 1 , ... , Y n be independent copies of them. Then for any ( a i , j ) (a_{i, j} ) ( a i , j ) and for p ≥ 1 p \ge 1 p ≥ 1 , it holds that
∥ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j ∥ p ≤ 4 ∥ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i Y j ∥ p
\begin{aligned}
\left\Vert \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j \right\Vert_p \le
4\left\Vert \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i Y_j \right\Vert_p
\end{aligned}
i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j p ≤ 4 i = j ∑ a i , j X i Y j p
Proof. Let B 1 , . . . , B n B_1, ..., B_n B 1 , ... , B n be independent Bernoulli random variables each of expectation 1 / 2 1 / 2 1/2 . Then
∥ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j ∥ p = ( E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j ∣ p ] ) 1 / p = ( E X [ ∣ 4 E B [ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ] ∣ p ] ) 1 / p ≤ ( E X [ E B [ 4 ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ] ] ) 1 / p ( Jensen ) = 4 ( E X E B [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ] ) 1 / p = 4 ( E B E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ] ) 1 / p
\begin{aligned}
\left\Vert \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j \right\Vert_p
&= \left( \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j \right|^p \right]\right)^{1 / p} \\
&= \left( \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| 4 \mathbb{E}_B \left[ \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right] \right|^p \right]\right)^{1 / p} \\
&\le \left( \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \mathbb{E}_B \left[ 4 \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right] \right]\right)^{1 / p} & (\text{Jensen} ) \\
&= 4 \left( \mathbb{E}_X \mathbb{E}_B \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right]\right)^{1 / p} \\
&= 4 \left( \mathbb{E}_B \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right]\right)^{1 / p}
\end{aligned}
i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j p = E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j p 1/ p = E X 4 E B i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p 1/ p ≤ E X E B 4 i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p 1/ p = 4 E X E B i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p 1/ p = 4 E B E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p 1/ p ( Jensen ) Question to ponder: Under what condition can we exchange the order of expectation (integration)?
But
E B E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ] ≤ max B E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ] .
\mathbb{E}_B \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right] \le \max_B \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right].
E B E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p ≤ B max E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p . Let
B ∗ = ( b 1 ∗ , . . . , b n ∗ ) = arg max B E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) ∣ p ]
B^* = (b^*_1, ..., b^*_n) = \arg \max_{B} \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j B_i (1 - B_j) \right|^p \right]
B ∗ = ( b 1 ∗ , ... , b n ∗ ) = arg B max E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j B i ( 1 − B j ) p Define S ≐ { i : b i ∗ = 1 } S \doteq \{ i : b^*_i = 1 \} S ≐ { i : b i ∗ = 1 } . Then
E X [ ∣ ∑ i ≠ j a i , j X i X j b i ∗ ( 1 − b j ∗ ) ∣ p ] = E X [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ S , j ∉ S a i , j X i X j ∣ p ] = E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ S , j ∉ S a i , j X i Y j ∣ p ]
\begin{aligned}
\mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \neq j} a_{i,j} X_i X_j b^*_i (1 - b^*_j) \right|^p \right]
&= \mathbb{E}_X \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in S, j \notin S } a_{i,j} X_i X_j \right|^p \right] \\
&= \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in S, j \notin S } a_{i,j} X_i Y_j \right|^p \right]
\end{aligned}
E X i = j ∑ a i , j X i X j b i ∗ ( 1 − b j ∗ ) p = E X i ∈ S , j ∈ / S ∑ a i , j X i X j p = E X , Y i ∈ S , j ∈ / S ∑ a i , j X i Y j p Let Z 1 , . . . , Z n Z_1, ..., Z_n Z 1 , ... , Z n and Z 1 ′ , . . . , Z n ′ Z_1', ..., Z_n' Z 1 ′ , ... , Z n ′ both be independent copies of X 1 , . . . , X n X_1, ..., X_n X 1 , ... , X n . Then
E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ S , j ∉ S a i , j X i Y j ∣ p ] = E X , Y [ ∣ E Z , Z ′ ( ∑ i ∈ S a i , j X i ⋅ ( ∑ j ∉ S Y j + ∑ j ∈ S Z j ′ ) + ∑ i ∉ S a i , j Z i ⋅ ( ∑ j ∉ S Y j + ∑ j ∈ S Z j ′ ) ) ∣ p ] ( E [ Z i ] = E [ Z j ′ ] = 0 ) ≤ E X , Y E Z , Z ′ [ ∣ ∑ i ∈ S a i , j X i ⋅ ( ∑ j ∉ S Y j + ∑ j ∈ S Z j ′ ) + ∑ i ∉ S a i , j Z i ⋅ ( ∑ j ∉ S Y j + ∑ j ∈ S Z j ′ ) ∣ p ] ( Jensen ) = E X , Y [ ∣ ∑ i , j a i , j X i Y j ∣ p ] .
\begin{aligned}
\mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in S, j \notin S } a_{i,j} X_i Y_j \right|^p \right]
&= \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \mathbb{E}_{Z, Z'} \left( \sum_{i \in S} a_{i,j} X_i \cdot \left( \sum_{j \notin S} Y_j + \sum_{j \in S} Z_j' \right) + \sum_{i \notin S} a_{i,j} Z_i \cdot \left( \sum_{j \notin S} Y_j + \sum_{j \in S} Z_j' \right) \right) \right|^p \right] & ( \mathbb{E}[Z_i ] = \mathbb{E} [ Z_j' ] = 0 ) \\
&\le \mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \mathbb{E}_{Z, Z'} \left[ \left| \sum_{i \in S} a_{i,j} X_i \cdot \left( \sum_{j \notin S} Y_j + \sum_{j \in S} Z_j' \right) + \sum_{i \notin S} a_{i,j} Z_i \cdot \left( \sum_{j \notin S} Y_j + \sum_{j \in S} Z_j' \right) \right|^p \right] & (\text{Jensen} ) \\
&=\mathbb{E}_{X, Y} \left[ \left| \sum_{i , j } a_{i,j} X_i Y_j \right|^p \right].
\end{aligned}
E X , Y i ∈ S , j ∈ / S ∑ a i , j X i Y j p = E X , Y E Z , Z ′ i ∈ S ∑ a i , j X i ⋅ j ∈ / S ∑ Y j + j ∈ S ∑ Z j ′ + i ∈ / S ∑ a i , j Z i ⋅ j ∈ / S ∑ Y j + j ∈ S ∑ Z j ′ p ≤ E X , Y E Z , Z ′ i ∈ S ∑ a i , j X i ⋅ j ∈ / S ∑ Y j + j ∈ S ∑ Z j ′ + i ∈ / S ∑ a i , j Z i ⋅ j ∈ / S ∑ Y j + j ∈ S ∑ Z j ′ p = E X , Y [ i , j ∑ a i , j X i Y j p ] . ( E [ Z i ] = E [ Z j ′ ] = 0 ) ( Jensen ) □ \square □
← Back to all notes Back to top ↑