Let ( Ω , F , μ ) (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mu) ( Ω , F , μ ) be a measure space.Let f : Ω → C f: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{C} f : Ω → C be a complex valued function.
It can be written as f ( ω ) ≐ g ( ω ) + i h ( ω ) f(\omega) \doteq g(\omega) + i h(\omega) f ( ω ) ≐ g ( ω ) + ih ( ω ) , where g , h g, h g , h are both real functions on Ω \Omega Ω .
Definition [Measurability]. A function f f f is measurable F \mathcal{F} F if both g g g and h h h are.
Definition [Integral]. f f f is integrable if both g g g and h h h are, and its integral is defined by
∫ f d μ ≐ ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ .
\int f \, d \mu \doteq \int g \, d \mu + i \int h \, d \mu.
∫ f d μ ≐ ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ .
Theorem. f f f is integrable if and only if ∣ f ∣ |f| ∣ f ∣ is integrable.
Remark: the integral of the former is complex-valued, while the later is real-valued.
Proof.
The claim follows from that
max { ∣ g ∣ , ∣ h ∣ } ≤ ∣ f ∣ = ∣ g ∣ 2 + ∣ h ∣ 2 ≤ ∣ g ∣ + ∣ h ∣ .
\max \{ |g|, |h| \} \le |f| = \sqrt{|g|^2 + |h|^2} \le |g| + |h|.
max { ∣ g ∣ , ∣ h ∣ } ≤ ∣ f ∣ = ∣ g ∣ 2 + ∣ h ∣ 2 ≤ ∣ g ∣ + ∣ h ∣. □ \square □
Theorem [Linearity]. Let f 1 , f 2 f_1, f_2 f 1 , f 2 be integrable.
Then f 1 + f 2 f_1 + f_2 f 1 + f 2 is integrable, and
∫ f 1 + f 2 d μ = ∫ f 1 d μ + ∫ f 2 d μ .
\int f_1 + f_2 \, d \mu = \int f_1 \, d \mu + \int f_2 \, d \mu.
∫ f 1 + f 2 d μ = ∫ f 1 d μ + ∫ f 2 d μ .
Proof.
The integrability of f 1 + f 2 f_1 + f_2 f 1 + f 2 follows from the one of ∣ f 1 + f 2 ∣ |f_1 + f_2| ∣ f 1 + f 2 ∣ , which is integrable as ∣ f 1 + f 2 ∣ ≤ ∣ f 1 ∣ + ∣ f 2 ∣ |f_1 + f_2| \le |f_1| + |f_2| ∣ f 1 + f 2 ∣ ≤ ∣ f 1 ∣ + ∣ f 2 ∣ .
To prove linearity, let f 1 = g 1 + i h 1 f_1 = g_1 + i h_1 f 1 = g 1 + i h 1 and f 2 = g 2 + i h 2 f_2 = g_2 + i h_2 f 2 = g 2 + i h 2 .
Then
∫ f 1 + f 2 d μ ≐ ∫ g 1 + g 2 d μ + i ∫ h 1 + h 2 d μ = ∫ g 1 d μ + i ∫ h 1 d μ + ∫ g 2 d μ + i ∫ h 2 d μ ≐ ∫ f 1 d μ + ∫ f 2 d μ .
\begin{aligned}
\int f_1 + f_2 \, d \mu
&\doteq \int g_1 + g_2 \, d \mu + i \int h_1 + h_2 \, d \mu \\
&= \int g_1 \, d \mu + i \int h_1 \, d \mu
+ \int g_2 \, d \mu + i \int h_2 \, d \mu \\
&\doteq \int f_1 \, d \mu + \int f_2 \, d \mu.
\end{aligned}
∫ f 1 + f 2 d μ ≐ ∫ g 1 + g 2 d μ + i ∫ h 1 + h 2 d μ = ∫ g 1 d μ + i ∫ h 1 d μ + ∫ g 2 d μ + i ∫ h 2 d μ ≐ ∫ f 1 d μ + ∫ f 2 d μ . □ \square □
Theorem. If f f f is integrable, then
∣ ∫ f d μ ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ .
\left| \int f \, d \mu \right|
\le \int |f| \, d \mu.
∫ f d μ ≤ ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ .
Proof. Let f = g + i h f = g + i h f = g + ih .
Consider first that g g g and h h h are simple functions.
W.L.O.G., assume g = ∑ k ∈ [ n ] x k I A k g = \sum_{k \in [n]} x_k \mathbb{I}_{A_k} g = ∑ k ∈ [ n ] x k I A k , h = ∑ k ∈ [ n ] y k I A k h = \sum_{k \in [n]} y_k \mathbb{I}_{A_k} h = ∑ k ∈ [ n ] y k I A k , where A k ∈ F , k ∈ [ n ] A_k \in \mathcal{F}, k \in [n] A k ∈ F , k ∈ [ n ] constitute a partition of Ω \Omega Ω .
∣ ∫ f d μ ∣ = ∣ ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ ∣ = ∣ ∑ k ∈ [ n ] x k ⋅ μ ( A k ) + i ∑ k ∈ [ n ] y k ⋅ μ ( A k ) ∣ = ∣ ∑ k ∈ [ n ] ( x k + i y k ) ⋅ μ ( A k ) ∣ ≤ ∑ k ∈ [ n ] ∣ ( x k + i y k ) ⋅ μ ( A k ) ∣ = ∑ k ∈ [ n ] ∣ ( x k + i y k ) ∣ ⋅ μ ( A k ) = ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ .
\begin{aligned}
\left| \int f \, d \mu \right|
&= \left|\int g \, d \mu + i \int h \, d \mu \right| \\
&= \left| \sum_{k \in [n]} x_k \cdot \mu (A_k) + i \sum_{k \in [n]} y_k \cdot \mu (A_k) \right| \\
&= \left| \sum_{k \in [n]} \big( x_k + i y_k \big) \cdot \mu (A_k) \right| \\
&\le \sum_{k \in [n]} \left| \big( x_k + i y_k \big) \cdot \mu (A_k) \right| \\
&= \sum_{k \in [n]} \left| \big( x_k + i y_k \big) \right| \cdot \mu (A_k) \\
&= \int |f| \, d \mu.
\end{aligned}
∫ f d μ = ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ = k ∈ [ n ] ∑ x k ⋅ μ ( A k ) + i k ∈ [ n ] ∑ y k ⋅ μ ( A k ) = k ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( x k + i y k ) ⋅ μ ( A k ) ≤ k ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( x k + i y k ) ⋅ μ ( A k ) = k ∈ [ n ] ∑ ( x k + i y k ) ⋅ μ ( A k ) = ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ . For general integrable f = g + i h f = g + i h f = g + ih , there exists simple functions g n , h n g_n, h_n g n , h n such that
lim n g n = g \lim_n g_n = g lim n g n = g and lim n h n = h \lim_n h_n = h lim n h n = h ;
∣ g n ∣ ≤ ∣ g ∣ |g_n| \le |g| ∣ g n ∣ ≤ ∣ g ∣ and ∣ h n ∣ ≤ ∣ h ∣ |h_n| \le |h| ∣ h n ∣ ≤ ∣ h ∣ for all n ∈ N + n \in \mathbb{N}^+ n ∈ N + ;
lim n ∫ g n d μ = ∫ g d μ \lim_n \int g_n \, d \mu = \int g \, d \mu lim n ∫ g n d μ = ∫ g d μ and lim n ∫ h n d μ = ∫ h d μ \lim_n \int h_n \, d \mu = \int h \, d \mu lim n ∫ h n d μ = ∫ h d μ .
It follows that ∣ g n + i h n ∣ ↑ ∣ f ∣ |g_n + i h_n| \uparrow |f| ∣ g n + i h n ∣ ↑ ∣ f ∣ .
Hence,
∣ ∫ f d μ ∣ = ∣ ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ ∣ = ∣ lim n ∫ ( g n + i h n ) d μ ∣ = lim n ∣ ∫ g n + i h n d μ ∣ ≤ ( a ) lim n ∫ ∣ g n + i h n ∣ d μ = ( b ) ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ ,
\begin{aligned}
\left| \int f \, d \mu \right|
&= \left|\int g \, d \mu + i \int h \, d \mu \right| \\
&= \left| \lim_n \int \left( g_n + i h_n \right)\, d \mu \right| \\
&= \lim_n \left| \int g_n + i h_n \, d \mu \right| \\
&\stackrel{(a)}{\le} \lim_n \int \left| g_n + i h_n \right| \, d \mu \\
&\stackrel{(b)}{=} \int |f| \, d \mu,
\end{aligned}
∫ f d μ = ∫ g d μ + i ∫ h d μ = n lim ∫ ( g n + i h n ) d μ = n lim ∫ g n + i h n d μ ≤ ( a ) n lim ∫ ∣ g n + i h n ∣ d μ = ( b ) ∫ ∣ f ∣ d μ , where Inequality ( a ) (a) ( a ) follows from previous claim, and Inequality ( b ) (b) ( b ) follows from monotone convergence theorem.
□ \square □
Theorem. Suppose that f n = g n + i h n f_n = g_n + i h_n f n = g n + i h n are complex integrable functions satisfying ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ ∣ f n ∣ d μ < ∞ \sum_{n \ge 1} \int |f_n| \, d \mu < \infty ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ ∣ f n ∣ d μ < ∞ .
Then ∑ n ≥ 1 f n \sum_{n \ge 1} f_n ∑ n ≥ 1 f n is integrable, and
∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 f n d μ = ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ f n d μ .
\int \sum_{n \ge 1} f_n \, d \mu = \sum_{n \ge 1} \int f_n \, d \mu.
∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ f n d μ = n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ f n d μ .
Proof.
By monotone convergence theorem, we have
∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 ∣ f n ∣ d μ = ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ ∣ f n ∣ d μ < ∞ .
\int \sum_{n \ge 1} |f_n| \, d \mu = \sum_{n \ge 1} \int |f_n| \, d \mu < \infty.
∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ ∣ f n ∣ d μ = n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ ∣ f n ∣ d μ < ∞. Since
∣ ∑ n ≥ 1 g n ∣ ≤ ∑ n ≥ 1 ∣ g n ∣ ≤ ∑ n ≥ 1 ∣ f n ∣ ,
\Bigg| \sum_{n \ge 1} g_n \Bigg| \le \sum_{n \ge 1} |g_n| \le \sum_{n \ge 1} |f_n|,
n ≥ 1 ∑ g n ≤ n ≥ 1 ∑ ∣ g n ∣ ≤ n ≥ 1 ∑ ∣ f n ∣ , ∑ n ≥ 1 g n \sum_{n \ge 1} g_n ∑ n ≥ 1 g n is integrable.
Via dominated convergence theorem,
∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 g n d μ = ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ g n d μ .
\int \sum_{n \ge 1} g_n \, d \mu = \sum_{n \ge 1} \int g_n \, d \mu.
∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ g n d μ = n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ g n d μ . Similar argument shows that ∑ n ≥ 1 h n \sum_{n \ge 1} h_n ∑ n ≥ 1 h n is integrable, and
∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 h n d μ = ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ h n d μ .
\int \sum_{n \ge 1} h_n \, d \mu = \sum_{n \ge 1} \int h_n \, d \mu.
∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ h n d μ = n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ h n d μ . Therefore, ∑ n ≥ 1 f n \sum_{n \ge 1} f_n ∑ n ≥ 1 f n is integrable, and
∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 f n d μ ≐ ∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 g n d μ + i ∫ ∑ n ≥ 1 h n d μ = ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ g n d μ + ∑ n ≥ 1 i ∫ h n d μ ≐ ∑ n ≥ 1 ∫ f n d μ .
\begin{aligned}
\int \sum_{n \ge 1} f_n \, d \mu
&\doteq \int \sum_{n \ge 1} g_n \, d \mu
+ i \int \sum_{n \ge 1} h_n \, d \mu \\
&= \sum_{n \ge 1} \int g_n \, d \mu
+ \sum_{n \ge 1} i \int h_n \, d \mu \\
&\doteq \sum_{n \ge 1} \int f_n \, d \mu.
\end{aligned}
∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ f n d μ ≐ ∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ g n d μ + i ∫ n ≥ 1 ∑ h n d μ = n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ g n d μ + n ≥ 1 ∑ i ∫ h n d μ ≐ n ≥ 1 ∑ ∫ f n d μ . □ \square □
Reference
[1] P. Billingsley, Probability and measure Anniversary Edition, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1995.
← Back to all notes Back to top ↑