Definition

Let (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P}) be a probability space, and XX be a random variable on the space. Further, denote μ\mu the distribution of XX, s.t.,

μ(A)=P(X−1(A)),∀A∈B, \begin{aligned} &\mu(A) = \mathbb{P} \Big( X^{-1}(A) \Big), &\forall A \in \mathcal{B}, \end{aligned}

where B\mathcal{B} is the collection of Borel set on R\mathbb{R}.

Definition. The characteristic function r.w.t. μ\mu is given by

φ(t)=∫Reitx μ(dx). \varphi(t) = \int_\mathbb{R} e^{itx} \, \mu (dx) .

Theorem.

φ(t)=E[eitX]. \varphi(t) = \mathbb{E} \left[ e^{itX} \right].

Proof. Recall that, by definition of expectation, we have

E[eitX]≐∫ΩeitX(ω) P(dω)≐∫Ω(sin⁡(tX(ω))+i⋅cos⁡(tX(ω))) P(dω)=(a)∫Rsin⁡(tx) μ(dx)+i⋅∫Rcos⁡(tx) μ(dx)=∫Reitx μ(dx)=φ(t), \begin{aligned} \mathbb{E} \left[ e^{itX} \right] &\doteq \int_\Omega e^{it X(\omega) } \, \mathbb{P} (d \omega) \\ &\doteq \int_\Omega \left( \sin \big( t X(\omega) \big) + i \cdot \cos \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right) \, \mathbb{P} (d \omega) \\ &\stackrel{(a)}{=} \int_\mathbb{R} \sin \big( t x \big) \, \mu (dx) + i \cdot \int_\mathbb{R} \cos \big( t x \big) \, \mu (d x) \\ &= \int_\mathbb{R} e^{itx} \, \mu (dx) \\ &= \varphi(t), \end{aligned}

where in Equation (a)(a), we have applied the fact that for each function ff that is measurable B/B\mathcal{B} / \mathcal{B},

∫Ωf(X(ω)) P(dω)=∫Rf(x) μ(dx). \int_\Omega f(X(\omega)) \, \mathbb{P}(d\omega) = \int_\mathbb{R} f(x) \, \mu(dx).

□\square

Independence

Theorem. Let XX and YY be independent random variables. Then

φ(X+Y)=φ(X)φ(Y). \varphi(X + Y) = \varphi(X) \varphi(Y).

Proof. Since XX and YY are independent, the following pairs of random variables are independent

  1. sin⁡(tX(ω))\sin \big( t X(\omega) \big), sin⁡(tY(ω))\sin \big( t Y(\omega) \big);
  2. cos⁡(tX(ω))\cos \big( t X(\omega) \big), cos⁡(tY(ω))\cos \big( t Y(\omega) \big);
  3. sin⁡(tX(ω))\sin \big( t X(\omega) \big), cos⁡(tY(ω))\cos \big( t Y(\omega) \big);
  4. cos⁡(tX(ω))\cos \big( t X(\omega) \big), sin⁡(tY(ω))\sin \big( t Y(\omega) \big).
φ(X+Y)=E[eit(X+Y)]=E[(sin⁡(tX(ω))+i⋅cos⁡(tX(ω)))(sin⁡(tY(ω))+i⋅cos⁡(tY(ω)))]=E[sin⁡(tX(ω))]E[sin⁡(tY(ω))]−E[cos⁡(tX(ω))]E[cos⁡(tY(ω))]+iE[sin⁡(tX(ω))]E[cos⁡(tY(ω))]+iE[cos⁡(tX(ω))]E[sin⁡(tY(ω))]=φ(X)φ(Y). \begin{aligned} \varphi(X + Y) &= \mathbb{E} \left[ e^{it(X + Y)} \right] \\ &= \mathbb{E} \left[ \left( \sin \big( t X(\omega) \big) + i \cdot \cos \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right) \left( \sin \big( t Y(\omega) \big) + i \cdot \cos \big( t Y(\omega) \big) \right) \right] \\ &= \mathbb{E} \left[ \sin \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right] \mathbb{E} \left[ \sin \big( t Y(\omega) \big) \right] - \mathbb{E} \left[ \cos \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right] \mathbb{E} \left[ \cos \big( t Y(\omega) \big) \right] \\ &\qquad + i \mathbb{E} \left[ \sin \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right] \mathbb{E} \left[ \cos \big( t Y(\omega) \big) \right] + i \mathbb{E} \left[ \cos \big( t X(\omega) \big) \right] \mathbb{E} \left[ \sin \big( t Y(\omega) \big) \right] \\ &= \varphi(X) \varphi(Y). \end{aligned}

□\square

Uniqueness

Theorem. Let μ\mu and ν\nu be probability measures on R\mathbb{R}. If μ\mu and ν\nu has the same characteristic functions, then

μ(A)=ν(A),∀A∈B. \begin{aligned} &\mu(A) = \nu(A), &\forall A \in \mathcal{B}. \end{aligned}

The proof follows from the following lemma:

Lemma. Let a,b∈Ra, b \in \mathbb{R}, s.t. a<ba < b. If μ({a})=μ({b})=0\mu(\{a\}) = \mu(\{b\}) = 0, then

μ((a,b])=lim⁡T→∞12π∫−TTe−ita−e−itbitφ(t) dt. \mu \Big( (a, b] \Big) = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-T}^T \frac{e^{-ita} - e^{-itb}}{it} \varphi(t) \, d t.

Proof of the Theorem. For each n∈N+n \in \mathbb{N}_+, define En≐{x∈R:μ({x})≥1/n}E_n \doteq \{ x \in \mathbb{R} : \mu( \{ x \} ) \ge 1 / n \}. It is easy to see that ∣En∣≤n|E_n| \le n. It follows that the E≐∪n∈N+EnE \doteq \cup_{n \in \mathbb{N}_+} E_n is countable.

Consider the set S={(a,b]:a<b,μ({a})=μ({b})=0}S = \{ (a, b] : a < b, \mu(\{a\}) = \mu(\{b\}) = 0 \}. Obviously this is a π\pi system. Further, it generates B\mathcal{B}. To see this, for each point c∈Ec \in E, we can find

  1. a sequence a1,a2,…a_1, a_2, \ldots from Eˉ\bar{E} that increases to cc,
  2. a sequence b1,b2,…b_1, b_2, \ldots from Eˉ\bar{E} that decreases to cc.

Then (ai,bi]∈S(a_i, b_i] \in S, and ∩i≥1(ai,bi]=[c,c]\cap_{i \ge 1} (a_i, b_i] = [c, c].

It follows that every interval (a,b]⊆R(a, b] \subseteq \mathbb{R} can be generated by intervals in SS.

According to the lemma, μ\mu and ν\nu agrees on a π\pi system that generates B\mathcal{B}. By π\pi-λ\lambda theorem, they agree on each set in B\mathcal{B}.

□\square

Proof of the Lemma. We are going to prove that, for each a<ba < b,

lim⁡T→∞12π∫−TTe−ita−e−itbitφ(t) dt=μ(a,b)+μ({a,b}). \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-T}^T \frac{e^{-ita} - e^{-itb}}{it} \varphi(t) \, d t = \mu(a, b) + \mu \big( \{a, b \} \big).

Define

IT≐∫−TTe−ita−e−itbitφ(t) dt=∫−TT∫Re−it(a−x)−e−it(b−x)it μ(dx) dt=(a)∫R∫−TTe−it(a−x)−e−it(b−x)it dt μ(dx)=(b)∫R∫−TT[sin⁡((x−a)t)t−sin⁡((x−b)t)t] dt μ(dx)=(c)2∫R∫0T[sin⁡((x−a)t)t−sin⁡((x−b)t)t] dt μ(dx) \begin{aligned} I_T &\doteq \int_{-T}^T \frac{e^{-ita} - e^{-itb}}{it} \varphi(t) \, d t \\ &= \int_{-T}^T \int_\mathbb{R} \frac{e^{-it(a - x)} - e^{-it(b - x)}}{it} \,\mu(dx) \, d t \\ &\stackrel{(a)}{=} \int_\mathbb{R} \int_{-T}^T \frac{e^{-it(a - x)} - e^{-it(b - x)}}{it} \, d t \, \mu(dx) \\ &\stackrel{(b)}{=} \int_\mathbb{R} \int_{-T}^T \left[ \frac{\sin \big( (x - a) t \big) }{t} - \frac{\sin \big( (x - b) t \big) }{t} \right] \, d t \, \mu(dx) \\ &\stackrel{(c)}{=} 2 \int_\mathbb{R} \int_{0}^T \left[ \frac{\sin \big( (x - a) t \big) }{t} - \frac{\sin \big( (x - b) t \big) }{t} \right] \, d t \, \mu(dx) \end{aligned}

where

  • Equation (a)(a) holds: since e−ix=1+∫0xe−is dse^{-i x} = 1 + \int_0^x e^{-is} \, d s,

    ∣e−it(a−x)−e−it(b−x)it∣=∣∫(b−x)(a−x)e−is ds∣≤∣b−a∣ \begin{aligned} \left| \frac{e^{-it(a - x)} - e^{-it(b - x)}}{it} \right| = \left| \int_{(b - x)}^{(a - x)} e^{-is} \, d s \right| \le |b - a| \end{aligned}

    is therefore bounded. Hence, by Fubini's theorem, we can exchange the order of the double integral over finite product measure.

  • Equation (b)(b) holds: since cos⁡((x−a)t)/(it)\cos \big( (x - a) t \big) / (it) and cos⁡((x−b)t)/(it)\cos \big( (x - b) t \big) / (it) are odd functions over [−T,T][-T, T]

  • Equation (c)(c) holds: since sin⁡((x−a)t)/(it)\sin \big( (x - a) t \big) / (it) and sin⁡((x−b)t)/(it)\sin \big( (x - b) t \big) / (it) are even functions over [−T,T][-T, T]

Next, define S(T)≐∫0Tsin⁡xx dxS(T) \doteq \int_0^T \tfrac{\sin x}{x} \, dx. Introducing the function

sgn(θ)={1, if  θ>0,0, if  θ=0,−1, if  θ<0, \mathsf{sgn}(\theta) = \begin{cases} 1, &\text{ if }\, \theta > 0, \\ 0, &\text{ if }\, \theta = 0, \\ -1, &\text{ if }\, \theta < 0, \end{cases}

we can write

R(θ,T)≐∫0Tsin⁡θxx dx=sgn(θ)⋅S(∣θ∣T). R(\theta, T) \doteq \int_0^T \frac{\sin \theta x}{x} \, dx = \mathsf{sgn}(\theta) \cdot S(|\theta| T).

Since T→∞{T \rightarrow \infty}, S(T)→π/2S(T) \rightarrow \pi / 2, we have R(θ,T)→sgn(θ)⋅π/2R(\theta, T) \rightarrow \mathsf{sgn}(\theta) \cdot \pi / 2. Hence,

lim⁡T→∞{R(x−a,T)−R(x−b,T)}={0,x<a,π/2,x=a,π,a<x<b,π/2,x=b,0,x>b. \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \Big\{ R(x - a, T) - R(x - b, T) \Big\} = \begin{cases} 0, & x < a, \\ \pi / 2, & x = a, \\ \pi, & a < x < b, \\ \pi / 2, & x = b, \\ 0, & x > b. \end{cases}

Finally, ∣R(θ,T)∣=∣S(∣θ∣T)∣≤sup⁡tS(t)<∞|R(\theta, T)| = \Big| S \big( |\theta| T \big) \Big| \le \sup_t S(t) < \infty, by bounded convergence theorem,

lim⁡T→∞IT=2lim⁡T→∞∫R∫0T[sin⁡((x−a)t)t−sin⁡((x−b)t)t] dt μ(dx)=2lim⁡T→∞∫R{R(x−a,T)−R(x−b,T)} μ(dx)=2∫Rlim⁡T→∞{R(x−a,T)−R(x−b,T)} μ(dx)=2π⋅μ(a,b)+πμ({a,b}), \begin{aligned} \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} I_T &= 2 \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \int_\mathbb{R} \int_{0}^T \left[ \frac{\sin \big( (x - a) t \big) }{t} - \frac{\sin \big( (x - b) t \big) }{t} \right] \, d t \, \mu(dx) \\ &= 2 \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \int_\mathbb{R} \Big\{ R(x - a, T) - R(x - b, T) \Big\} \, \mu(dx) \\ &= 2 \int_\mathbb{R} \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \Big\{ R(x - a, T) - R(x - b, T) \Big\} \, \mu(dx) \\ &= 2 \pi \cdot \mu (a, b) + \pi \mu (\{a, b\}), \end{aligned}

which concludes the proof.

Remark. Here, let fT(x)≐R(x−a,T)−R(x−b,T)f_T(x) \doteq R(x - a, T) - R(x - b, T), and f(x)≐lim⁡T→∞fT(x)f(x) \doteq \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} f_T(x). Since fT(x)f_T(x) is bounded, assume that ∣fT(x)∣≤B,∀x,T|f_T(x)| \le B, \forall x, T.

Let ϵ>0\epsilon > 0. For each T∈R+T \in \mathbb{R}^+, define ET≐{x∈R:∣fT(x)−f(x)∣≤ϵ}E_T \doteq \{ x \in \mathbb{R} : | f_T(x) - f(x) | \le \epsilon \}. Then

∣∫RfT(x)−f(x) μ(dx)∣≤∫R∣fT(x)−f(x)∣ μ(dx)=∫ET∣fT(x)−f(x)∣ μ(dx)+∫ET‾∣fT(x)−f(x)∣ μ(dx)≤ϵ+2B⋅μ(ET‾). \begin{aligned} \left| \int_\mathbb{R} f_T(x) - f(x) \, \mu (dx) \right| &\le \int_\mathbb{R} \left| f_T(x) - f(x) \right|\, \mu (dx) \\ &= \int_{E_T} \left| f_T(x) - f(x) \right|\, \mu (dx) + \int_{\overline{E_T}} \left| f_T(x) - f(x) \right| \, \mu (dx) \\ &\le \epsilon + 2B \cdot \mu \Big( \overline{E_T} \Big). \end{aligned}

Finally, for x∉(a−ϵ,a+ϵ)∪(b−ϵ,b+ϵ)x \notin (a - \epsilon, a + \epsilon) \cup (b - \epsilon, b + \epsilon), we have ∣x−a∣T,∣x−b∣T≥ϵT|x - a| T, |x - b| T \ge \epsilon T. Hence,

∣fT(x)−f(x)∣≤2⋅∣S(ϵT)−S(∞)∣, |f_T(x) - f(x)| \le 2 \cdot \left| S(\epsilon T) - S(\infty)\right|,

which approaches 00 as T→∞T \rightarrow \infty. So

∣∫RfT(x)−f(x) μ(dx)∣→(1+2B)⋅ϵ. \begin{aligned} \left| \int_\mathbb{R} f_T(x) - f(x) \, \mu (dx) \right| \rightarrow (1 + 2B) \cdot \epsilon. \end{aligned}

□\square

Reference

[1] P. Billingsley, Probability and measure Anniversary Edition, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1995.

[2] R. Durrett, “Probability : theory and examples,” p. 432.